* Warning *
The letters "QC" marks the half-serious posts with reviews by the undersigned.
not recommended reading in bimbiminkia, amykette and everyone who is a pathological case of "syndrome of feeling offended."
today are moderately happy: my argument does not so much crap, I found a whole hazelnut in my ice cream last night, in the first episode of "Bones," was Stephen Fry (*_*).
those circumstances to suggest that the subsequent acid regurgitation not be an end in itself, but fully justified by the circumstances.
It is now known for some time that a widespread malpractice, and not in the amateur writing. And no, you do not write slash ficcyne idiotic.
The axiom in the prevailing contemporary writer has for some time now, the following:
" everyone can write a yellow"
By its very definition, the axiom is an assertion unprovable, but intrinsically true here, that this is demonstrably false as well.
Recently, is spreading the unpleasant conviction that anyone who has failed to prove, at least once in their lifetime, that the brother / son / cousin had stolen the biscuits and blamed the dog, anyone can write "shampoo", not "shampoo" on the shopping list, anyone who has emotional Paturnie to throw up on the next without having the money to the psychologist is able to write a crime novel.
Dependable, decent and not granted.
This is my new personal trinity, entirely absent from most of the works of pseudo-mystery writers that stand, mostly on the shelf of any bookstore, or those that propinano generalist and satellite television.
Judging from what circulates, I have concluded that most mystery writers are male individuals of moderate physical appearance, brainy, around forty, who have sexual activity disappointing, sporadic or absent.
The crime writer of the other half of the sky are harder to label, and because smaller, either because they have the unfortunate tendency to try to write like their male colleagues, and then ending up back in the old catalog, I would say-often- in spite of themselves.
At least that is what is apparent from their writings, often much worse than the most vulgar ficcyna Self-insertion marysuesca / garystuesca, with lots of muddy bed scene customary. With the single, small, significant difference that I read ficcyna free, pay him the yellow, salty and too expensive.
At this point, I wish to state that it is not unknown in Shrimp: I'm not going to get into the chair and say what you should or should not do to write a good yellow, I myself have much to learn about ; I never tire of repeating an author to be in high grass the grass-only, unfortunately.
What I wish to condemn, with my next post, is the 'hypocrisy critical gender , which creates literary cases lack of narrative consistency, to elevate the banal antics, hosanna products were bleak as the Copernican revolution writers of the third millennium, it's all wonderful, miraculous, spectacular ... But by what criterion?
Because the problem is not that they emphasize only those works that might be less successful for those who are already famous, but are raised to the laurels of triumph even beginners who, IMHO, would do good and right thing to devote to horseracing. In every possible sense of the term.
for me and your luck, there are also honest critics, who have the good sense to admit that, yes, in short, this new world crime writer of genius was not so brilliant: last but not least, the recent review of critical acclaim with one voice in a little 'bleating on the trilogy of the late Stieg Larsson, one of the authors in my opinion the most overrated of the decade. Why speak ill of the dead is not politically correct, but objectively what he wrote should be criticized in part. Negative criticism.
Unfortunately, these champions are rare and little say: the common practice is to inculcate in people the belief that, as the axiom states, anyone can write a mystery when nothing is further from the truth.
Yellow is a literary genre that demands the same commitment and same constancy of all others by the man / woman who decides to undertake the writing: not enough as the two lovers and the silly Machiavellian villain of the moment to make a good love story, so you do not need is a dead killed in the most paradoxical and can investigator saw a healthy carrier of mind to make a good yellow.
Therefore these considerations shed my ironic attempt to be just a handbook for those wishing to re-evaluate their views on contemporary mystery writers, by discovering what it would look better (IMHO, anyway) and what instead can be a pleasant recreation.
Dyo Not being on Earth, are always inclined to civil dialogue and peaceful: the links at the side allow you to contact me in many ways, if you do not agree with my views. The objections, the curses and-why not - even excommunications only ask to be well argued and, above all, written in Italian power.
Because I know how to read the case, but that the language of text messages.
the next QC, 99% with a writer who hates the chemistry nerd, and a handsome Australian who ignores the meaning of "Shut up!" ...
There are three elements to write a good thriller plot, plot and texture.
Ed McBain
0 comments:
Post a Comment